The proposal to increase the landed house tax has stirred up significant backlash from property developers across the country. With rising concerns over affordability, investor confidence, and housing demand, many in the real estate industry argue that the hike is poorly timed and could damage market stability.
According to the newly proposed tax structure, landed properties would face a considerable increase in annual property taxes, aimed at boosting government revenues and discouraging speculative buying. However, developers believe this move could do more harm than good, especially at a time when the housing market is trying to recover from recent economic strains.
Property developers have voiced a unified stance against the landed house tax hike, highlighting several reasons for their resistance. They claim the policy will:
Industry leaders from top real estate firms warn that these effects could lead to a “cooling” of the real estate market, which would have a ripple effect on employment, urban development, and the construction sector.
Developers argue that they are already burdened by inflation, rising construction material prices, and labor shortages. “Adding another layer of tax pressure through the landed house tax hike is not only unfair but counterproductive,” said Rajesh Menon, Director of SunRidge Properties. “It will directly affect the cost of living and the dreams of middle-class families hoping to buy a home.”
Several developers also pointed out that landed properties are often purchased by long-term homeowners rather than short-term investors. Hence, the argument that the tax will curb speculation doesn’t hold strong.
Many developers fear that the landed house tax hike will significantly alter buyer sentiment. With taxes increasing on landed homes, buyers might shift to high-rise apartments or opt to delay purchases altogether. This would not only result in reduced revenues for developers but also increase unsold inventory.
“People buy landed homes for the space and lifestyle it offers,” said Anita Desai, Sales Head at Prestige Realty Group. “If the tax hike makes these homes unaffordable, we could see demand drop by over 30% in certain areas.”
The property sector contributes heavily to GDP and employment. A slowdown in the landed housing market could have knock-on effects. “Construction, steel, cement, interiors, legal — all these sectors are interconnected,” said a senior analyst from the Real Estate Policy Forum. “Slowing down landed housing development due to high taxes will ripple through the economy.”
Developers fear that the landed house tax hike could result in developers pulling back from new projects, especially in suburban and semi-urban areas where demand for such homes is higher.
Foreign investors, who are already cautious due to global uncertainties, might become even more hesitant to invest in residential real estate. “An increase in property taxes is seen as a red flag,” explained Rajat Kapoor, a property investment advisor. “It suggests policy instability and increased holding costs.”
This could lead to a capital outflow from the real estate sector, further weakening its performance in the coming quarters.
Developers have urged the government to initiate a formal consultation process before passing the landed house tax hike. Several associations, including the National Real Estate Federation, have submitted petitions requesting the government to:
“We are not against contributing to national growth,” said Kumar Basu, President of the Builders’ Guild. “But any policy should be balanced and well-timed. Right now, this tax will do more harm than good.”
Surprisingly, homeowners and potential buyers have shown strong support for the developers’ stance. On social media, many users are voicing concerns that the landed house tax hike will make it harder for working-class families to own homes with proper space and privacy.
A recent poll conducted by a housing advocacy group showed that 64% of respondents oppose the tax hike, believing it punishes honest homeowners and discourages property investment.
Instead of a blanket hike, real estate analysts and think tanks have suggested alternative solutions:
These options, they argue, would preserve demand for landed homes while still helping the government meet its revenue goals.
The proposed tax hike is currently under parliamentary review. Developers have pledged to continue their protest and engage with stakeholders to ensure that the policy is reconsidered. The final decision will likely depend on public pressure, political negotiations, and broader economic indicators.
Until then, the debate around the landed house tax hike is expected to remain a key issue in the real estate and political landscape.
The strong opposition from developers against the landed house tax hike highlights the fragile state of the real estate sector and the need for balanced policymaking. With potential risks to affordability, investment, and economic growth, the government now faces a critical decision — whether to push forward with the hike or engage in deeper dialogue with developers and citizens alike.
Also Read – 2025 Bold Moves RARE Brokerage Realty Makes to Dominate America